The Supreme Court in June overruled Chevron deference, a major legal doctrine that articulated federal agencies’ ability to interpret the law. This raises the question of whether agency policies, like ...

This post was updated Aug. 4 at 10:11 p.m. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision June 28 to overturn the Chevron doctrine. The Chevron doctrine – named after the 1984 Supreme Court case ...

Originalist legal scholars Mike Ramsey and Mike Rappaport debate whether the major questions doctrine - an important theory underlying several recent Supreme Court decisions - can be squared with ...

A PDF version of this document with embedded text is available at the link below: (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is ...

The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving the deference that courts should give to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws that they administer. From health care ...

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine on Friday, a decades-old legal precedent that gives regulatory agencies leeway to interpret vague legislation when crafting regulations. The ...

Unlike the relatively straightforward de novo standard of review of the legal determinations of a court, judicial review of an administrative agency's legal determinations is more complex, especially ...

Under the Chevron doctrine, when a federal statute is ambiguous, courts are supposed to defer to the implementing agency's interpretation of the statute, provided the interpretation is reasonable. The ...

I’ve posted my new paper, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, to SSRN. I’ll be blogging about it over the next several days. (This is the same paper that ...